Ontario law firm who tried to sue former sugar baby named to tribunal

An Ontario lawyer who submitted a $229-million lawsuit versus his former “sugar baby” for alleged fraud had his case dismissed just after the court docket discovered he’d become “obsessed” with the younger lady when she tried to conclude their arrangement.

Azmat Ramal-Shah is now experiencing disciplinary proceedings by the Law Culture of Ontario (LSO) to figure out regardless of whether his actions represent qualified misconduct.

In 2016, Ramal-Shah, 30, achieved the 18-calendar year-aged College of Ottawa college student on the relationship site ‘Seeking Arrangements,’ described as a leading dating web-site for “sugar babies” and “sugar daddies,” in accordance to court docket paperwork reviewed by CTV Information Toronto.

The documents point out, the woman, who CTV Information Toronto has preferred to identify as ‘KJ,’ agreed to keep Ramal-Shah business “virtually” — she would hear to his stresses and deliver him friendship, and Ramal-Shah would help her with expenses.

“There was no dialogue of ‘a normal dating relationship’ at this time,” KJ explained in a sworn affidavit submitted to the courts. “We agreed on an arrangement where by I would not search for other sugar daddies. He determined to deliver me presents in exchange for extensive conversations and photos.”

Nonetheless, the January final decision aspects that Ramal-Shah before long claimed he was “in love” with KJ.

“He would frequently chat about his upcoming and the foreseeable future he would like to have with me,” KJ said in the affidavit. “I would entertain his fantasies as it was what he required out of the arrangement.”

Trying to get Arrangement is a internet site that connects so-called sugar babies with rich sugar daddies or sugar mommas, who present income or presents in exchange for time used. (In search of Arrangements)

KJ states in her account she saw no crimson flags in the course of the first yr of the arrangement, but following assembly Ramal-Shah in person for the 1st and only time, she statements he began to force her boundaries.

Approximately five many years right after the two initially related on line, Ramal-Shah submitted a $229-million, 340-paragraph lawsuit against KJ and her household, claiming she had deceived him and defrauded him of money.

Whilst Ramal-Shah’s declare was dismissed in January by a Justice of the Peace who considered it “an abuse of course of action,” lawful gurus and advocates say the lawsuit is emblematic of an perspective of entitlement about sugar toddlers, escorts, or intercourse workers’ time and the potential risks they confront when attempting to attract skilled boundaries.

CTV Information Toronto arrived at out to the two KJ and Ramal-Shah for comment. Both events declined.


It was in the weeks after the two fulfilled for dinner in Ottawa that KJ alleges Ramal-Shah’s behaviour started to make her really feel unsafe.

“At the commencing of 2017, [Ramal-Shah] grew to become possessive and would interrogate [KJ] about who she was investing time with. He threatened to destroy her status and would contact her harsh names these as “wh**e,” the choice states, introducing that KJ subsequently grew to become “very nervous.”

In March 2018, KJ tried to sever all connections to the attorney, blocking him on all social media accounts, the choice states, and started earning up excuses to prevent paying out time with the male.

“[She] lied to him stating that she could not meet with him on two situations – initial, because she had broken her leg, and on a different, she experienced been diagnosed and was being handled for most cancers, equally of which have been not correct,” the choice reads.

KJ mentioned during proceedings that these excuses were being untrue, and she had not been diagnosed with most cancers, but that she said them in an effort to stay away from meeting Ramal-Shah in-particular person all over again.

“On a lot of occasions, I mentioned I was no longer interested in talking to him if there was no benefit for me,” KJ said in her affidavit.

But the courtroom alleges Ramal-Shah refused to stop communications, making use of phony social media accounts less than the usernames ‘lawyerjustice123,’ ‘justiceseeker96,’ ‘cancertruth123,’ and ‘lawyers123456’ to contact KJ, her close friends, household, mother’s qualified colleagues, mother’s qualified clientele, and new boyfriend.

“I’ve tried using reasoning with [KJ] but I never believe she ever cherished me, this [has] all been about exploiting me for cash,” an e-mail from Ramal-Shah to KJ’s mom introduced as evidence in courtroom, reads.

“At this issue, I don’t consider there was a broken leg or surgeons or chemotherapy,” Ramal-Shah wrote. “I definitely considered [KJ] had cancer – plainly I was mistaken and was a target of fraud.”

Inside individuals e-mails, Ramal-Shah urged KJ’s mother to provide him a settlement to “keep [the issue] out of the courts.”

Finally, KJ’s relatives contacted law enforcement, retained legal counsel, and despatched Ramal-Shah various letters “asking him to stop-and-desist communications with [their family],” courtroom files state.

The conclusion states Ramal-Shah did not comply with these requests, and as an alternative, mocked them, contacting the KJ’ lawful counsel “a procuring mall law firm.”

LAWSUIT Launched

In April 2021, the LSO filed a Observe of Software versus Ramal-Shah alleging specialist misconduct. The proceedings are ongoing, and Ramal-Shah is permitted to proceed practising right up until a resolution is attained, the LSO advised CTV Information Toronto.

On Dec. 7, 2021, Ramal-Shah submitted a civil lawsuit towards KJ and her mothers and fathers looking for $229-million in damages.

Ramal-Shah’s assertion of assert alleged KJ conjured “false representations,” these as a broken leg, the loss of life of her aunt, and being addressed for cancer, that brought on him to continue on to ship her funds.

“Had [Ramal-Shah] recognized that [KJ] did not truly look at him his boyfriend then he would not have served her economically,” his statement of declare reads.

A published argument presented to the courts by authorized representation Charles Baker on behalf of the loved ones accused Ramal-Shah of using “the courts as his most recent, greatest instrument of revenge.”

“The Assertion of Assert seeks damages of $229-million, is 140 webpages, 359 paragraphs and, at its core, is a case of unrequited adore where the then roughly 30-calendar year-outdated plaintiff turned obsessed with the then 18-yr-aged […] whom he achieved on the on line dating web page,” the document reads.

In the end, Smith dismissed Ramal-Shah’s claim on the foundation that more than two yrs experienced handed because Ramal-Shah should have reasonably initially suspected he was staying lied to, and therefore the limitation time period experienced expired.

In addition, Smith asserted that Ramal-Shah’s statements against the KJ loved ones were being with out advantage, and that he should have reasonably anticipated to make payments to KJ when beginning a romance utilizing a “sugar daddies and sugar babies” courting web page. The Justice reported “no credible evidence was offered that [the KJ’] took any motion that triggered any harm in anyway to [Ramal-Shah].”

Alternatively, Smith stated Ramal-Shah had been left dissatisfied around the “extent” of his relationship with KJ and “grew to become obsessed with her when she ended their partnership.”

Smith deemed the lawsuit to be “an abuse of process” and requested Ramal-Shah to pay out fees to the KJ’ spouse and children in the amount of $15,616 as a reimbursement for charges.


Sandra Wesley, government director of Stella, a Canadian advocacy corporation for sexual intercourse personnel, claimed it’s essential to notice that whilst Ramal-Shah was requested to reimburse KJ’s family’s costs, in the long run, the situation was dismissed “on the foundation of not respecting court docket delays.”

“The decide factors to the frivolity of the situation, centered on the simple fact that he was inquiring for about $200-million and submitted hundreds of pages of proof,” Wesley mentioned. “We’ll in no way know how the scenario would have been determined if Ramal-Shah was not plainly vexatious, late, and had not associated harmless individuals like KJ’s mom and dad.”

“It’s super critical that no intercourse employee hears [this] tale and thinks they can get cash from their sugar daddy in court docket or that courts have identified sugar toddlers as reputable in some way,” she ongoing.

Wesley explained the circumstance does present an possibility to speak about clients “harassing females in impunity.”

“Everyone is complicit when they develop a social weather exactly where ‘I’ll inform your family members and employers that you are a wh**e’ is a threat that carries real body weight,” she stated.

Ellie Ade Kur, who sits on the Board of Administrators at Maggie’s Toronto, a hurt reduction firm that provides outreach and supportive services to intercourse staff in Toronto, informed CTV Information Toronto that, in this scenario, a deficiency of regulations in area for escorts or sugar toddlers place KJ in a susceptible posture.

“It’s not that sex workers, escorts or sugar babies usually are not equipped to set boundaries with persons – it is that men and women don’t regard those people boundaries since of the stigma, discrimination and criminalization of intercourse work,” Ade Kur explained.

In just her work, Ade Kur stated she’s spoken with sex workers or escorts who have confronted adverse reactions when attempting to draw boundaries with their purchasers.

“The notion that this man threatened to damage her reputation, he would call her a wh**e, phone her slurs is mainly because sexual intercourse perform by itself is nonetheless so intensely criminalized and policed [and] a lot of persons with lousy intentions will consider benefit of that,” she discussed.

Although KJ had the ability to find legal protections from Ramal-Shah, Ade Kaur reported that, in most instances, all those who give intercourse operate or escort companies – particularly criminalized expert services – do not.

“Even if we’re conversing about licensed expert services, men and women can drop their kids, they can be pushed out of their work opportunities or isolated from their people and friends,” she mentioned.” The consequences can be really harmful,– sexual intercourse personnel have absent lacking, or been murdered or been brutalized by police instantly.”

Decriminalization and de-stigmatization would do considerably to fix that situation, she stated, as it would allow sex staff to freely look for protections with no anxiety of reprisal.

“Pushing toward decriminalization is so significant for the reason that, in situations like this, it would make guaranteed that sex workers and escorts have entry to some kind of authorized or health and fitness and security protections.”

Leave a Reply